A giant millipede from Mozambique shot against late afternoon sun; the trees in the background help filter the sunlight and reduce its intensity. [Canon 7D, Canon 14mm, Canon MT-24EX twin light]Right after finding out that you should always take the lens cap off before taking a picture, the second most important lesson in photography that we usually learn is that we should not point the lens against the sun. There is a very good reason for this: the camera’s light metering system will attempt to compensate for the direct sun’s light intensity by dramatically reducing the exposure time, which in turn will render all other objects in the frame severely underexposed. (Or, if you use a telephoto lens, you can blind yourself.) We all have seen crappy pictures of people standing on the beach at sunset, rendered as muddy silhouettes against a dimly lit sky, despite the fact that the scene appeared vibrant and majestic to the person holding the camera. This is because cameras are not equipped with the most powerful of all computing machines, the human brain, which can not only record a scene, but also interpret it and selectively adjust its light parameters.
A grass mantis (Hoplocorypha sp.) from Botswana against the setting sun. Here I used only a very weak “pop” of flash because I wanted the insect to appear almost as a silhouette. [Nikon D1x, Sigma 180mm, flash Nikon SB-28DX]
But there are ways of compensating for the seemingly overwhelming intensity of direct sunlight, and shooting against the sun is not as difficult as many photographers think. The glowing orb of our nearest star can be incorporated in many compositions, including macro shots of insects and other small organisms, with only a bit of preparation.
The first and most important rule for shooting against the sun is to make sure that your lens is clean. I mean, really, really clean. Because even the tiniest smudges, specks, or scratches will cause a tremendous amount of ugly diffraction and flare, which can ruin a beautifully composed scene. These optical aberrations are often difficult to notice through the viewfinder.
Secondly, you may need to use a source of “fill-in” light to help illuminate the object in the foreground. In most cases this will be a flash, but you can also use a collapsible silver or gold reflector (such as this one). I say “may need to” because you can position your subject in the frame in such a way that it sits directly in the path of the sunlight, blocking the most intense part of it. If the subject (e.g., a flower, a butterfly) is thin or translucent enough, the light filtering through its body will be sufficient to properly illuminate it. In most cases, however, a “pop” of flash will be needed to counterbalance the sunlight.
Flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis) from Mozambique; I framed the animal in such a way that its body blocked the sun, but I still needed to add some fill-in flash to counterbalance the brightness of the sky. [Canon 7D, Canon 14mm, Canon MT-24EX twin light]Exposing for shots against the sun is a little tricky. In my experience it is easier to use fully manual exposure controls, rather than using the camera’s automatic settings, such as the Aperture Priority. The easiest way to do it is to measure the exposure time by pointing the lens at a point close to the edge of the sun, but not the sun directly. Take a photo and see how the sun is exposed: its center should appear slightly overexposed, but its edges should not. Once you have found the correct exposure settings for the sun, add the counterbalancing light. Again, I would suggest using a flash in the manual mode, and adjust its power incrementally until you find the right intensity. It goes without saying that it is much easier to fine tune the exposure settings for subjects that are not particularly agile. Thus, I would suggest to practice the exposure adjustments on inanimate objects, such as branches or flowers, before you attempt to photograph a running beetle against the sun.
It is easier to shoot against the sun later in the afternoon, when the sun is low on the horizon, and its light intensity is lower. Late afternoon/early evening light will also add to the overall atmosphere of the scene.
The flowers of the Impala lily (Adenium multiflorum) shot against the sun; here I did not need any fill-in light because the sunlight filtered through their corollas provided enough illumination. [Canon 7D, Canon 14mm]Nearly any lens can be used to shoot against the sun, but this approach works really well with wide angle lenses. This is because it is easier to fit both your main subject and a large portion of the sky into the frame, which in turn means that the sun itself does not dominate and overpower the scene. At the other end of the spectrum, really long macro lenses (150mm and more) can also be used, and their benefit is that the sun will appear larger in relation to your subject; they may, however, require a more powerful source of the fill-in light.
I notice all of the photos included in this post were shot with the 14mm lens. I would love to have this lens someday, but right now it’s not in the budget. I have a 17-85mm on an APC-S type body, so my effective low end is 24mm – do you think that is low enough to try some sun-in-frame shots?
Only one way to find out! But, yes, I think you should be able to use the 17-85mm for these types of shots. I often use my 16-35mm on a camera with a 1.6 x cropping factor, and it still gives me plenty of field of view to incorporate the sun and a lot of the sky.
thanks for a great article and for sharing your incredible pictures! especially that mantis one blows my mind – great exposure on that one! great tips, very inspiring. i know what i’ll do tomorrow: grab my flash and go practise.
i’m glad you mention it, and it’s worth pointing out again: always be very careful when looking at the sun through your camera, especially with longer lenses. i know several people who have permanent eye damage because of this.
again, thanks for a great article – this should be shared.
Hi Piotr,
I notice all of the photos included in this post were shot with the 14mm lens. I would love to have this lens someday, but right now it’s not in the budget. I have a 17-85mm on an APC-S type body, so my effective low end is 24mm – do you think that is low enough to try some sun-in-frame shots?
Hi Ted,
Only one way to find out! But, yes, I think you should be able to use the 17-85mm for these types of shots. I often use my 16-35mm on a camera with a 1.6 x cropping factor, and it still gives me plenty of field of view to incorporate the sun and a lot of the sky.
thanks for a great article and for sharing your incredible pictures! especially that mantis one blows my mind – great exposure on that one! great tips, very inspiring. i know what i’ll do tomorrow: grab my flash and go practise.
i’m glad you mention it, and it’s worth pointing out again: always be very careful when looking at the sun through your camera, especially with longer lenses. i know several people who have permanent eye damage because of this.
again, thanks for a great article – this should be shared.